Recommended Illuminance Levels for Various Tasks/Activities/ Locations
(A) Recommendations on Illuminance :
Scales of illuminance :
- The minimum illuminance for all non-working interiors, has been mentioned as 20 Lux (as per IS 3646)
- A factor of approximately 15 represents the smallest significant difference in subjective effect of illuminances.
- Therefore , the following scale of illuminances is recommended. 20-30-50-75-100-150-200-300-500-750-1000-1500-2000…. Lux.
Illuminance ranges :
- Because circumstances may be significantly different for different interiors used for the same application or for different conditions for the same kind of activity, a range of illuminances is recommended for each type of interior or activity intended of a single value of illuminance.
- Each range consists of three successive steps of the recommended scale of illuminances. For working interiors, the middle value (R) of each range represents the recommended service illuminance that would be used unless one or more of the factors , mentioned below apply
- The higher value (H) of the range should be used at exceptional cases where low reflectances or contrasts are present in the task , errors are costly to rectify, visual work is critical, accuracy or higher productivity is of great importance and the visual capacity of the worker makes it necessary.
- Similarly, lower value (L) of the range may be used when reflectances or contrasts are unusually high speed and accuracy is not important and the task is executed only occasionally.
(B) Recommended Illumination :
- The following Table A gives the recommended illuminance range for different tasks and activities for chemical sector.
- The values are related to the visual requirements of the task to user’s satisfaction to practical experience and to the need for cost effective use of energy.
- For recommended illumination in other sectors, reader may refer lluminating Engineer Society Recommendations Handbook . confirms
Chemicals :
Petroleum, Chemical and Petrochemical works
Exterior walkways, platforms, stairs and ladders 30-50-100
Exterior pump and valve areas 50-100-150
Pump and compressor houses 100-150-200
Process plant with remote control 30-50-100
Process plant requiring occasional manual intervention 50-100-150
Permanently occupied work stations in process plant 150-200-300 200-300-500
Control rooms for process plant 200-300-500
Pharmaceuticals Manufacturer and Fine chemicals manufacturer
Pharmaceutical manufacturer Grinding, granulating, mixing, drying, tableting, sterilising, washing,
preparation of solution, filling, capping, wrapping, hardening 300-500-750
Fine chemical manufacturers
Exterior walkways, platforms, stairs and ladders 50-100-150
Process plant 300-500-750
Fine chemical finishing 300-500-750
Inspection 300-500-750
Soap manufacturer 200-300-500
General area 100-200-300
Automatic processes 200-300-500
Control panels 200-300-500
Machines 200-300-500
Paint works
General 200-300-500
Automatic processes 150-200-300
Control panels 200-300-500
Special batch mixing 500-750-1000
Colour matching 750-100-1500
Case Examples :
Energy Efficient Replacement Options :
- The lamp efficacy is the ratio of light output in lumens to power input to lamps in watts. Over the years development in lamp technology has led to improvements in efficiency of lamps.
- However, the low efficacy lamps, such as incandescent bulbs, still constitute a major share of the lighting load. High efficacy gas discharge lamps suitable for different types of applications offer appreciable scope for energy conservation.
- Typical energy efficient replacement options, along with the per cent energy saving, are given in Table A
Sector |
Lamp |
Power |
||
Existing |
Proposed |
Watts |
% |
|
Domestic/commercial |
GLS 100W |
*CFL 25W |
75 |
75 |
Industry |
GLS 13W GLS TLS |
*CFL 9W Blended 160W TLD |
4 40 4 |
30 20 10 |
Industry/Commercial |
HPMV 250W HPMV 400W |
HPSV 150W SPSV 250W |
100 |
37 |
150 |
35 |
Wattage of CFL includes energy consumption in ballasts.
- The energy saving potential, in typical case of replacement of inefficient lamps with efficient lamps in street lighting is given in the Table B.
Existing |
Replaced |
Savings |
|||||
Type |
W |
Life |
Type |
W |
Life |
W |
% |
GLS |
200 |
1000 |
ML |
160 |
5000 |
40 |
7 |
GLS |
300 |
1000 |
ML |
250 |
5000 |
50 |
17 |
TL |
2 X 40 |
5000 |
TL |
2 X 36 |
5000 |
8 |
6 |
HPMV |
125 |
5000 |
HPSV |
70 |
12000 |
25 |
44 |
HPMV |
250 |
5000 |
HPSV |
150 |
12000 |
100 |
40 |
HPMV |
400 |
5000 |
HPSV |
250 |
12000 |
150 |
38 |